w<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fuzzier Logic &#187; Darwin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/tag/darwin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com</link>
	<description>Logic. Just a bit woolier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blog for Darwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/136</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/136#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogswarm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://citizenship.typepad.com/blogfordarwin"></a>This post forms part of the &#8216;Blog for Darwin&#8217; blog carnival. </p> <p>I wasn&#8217;t going to write this post. I am very much of the opinion that holding up one man as a figurehead for an entire science is a mistake, and sets up too many straw-man arguments for detractors to propound (of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="kcite-section" kcite-section-id="136">
<p><a href="http://citizenship.typepad.com/blogfordarwin"><img class="alignleft" title="Blog For Darwin" src="http://citizenship.typepad.com/blogfordarwin/DarwinBadge.gif" alt="" width="135" height="149" /></a><em>This post forms part of the &#8216;Blog for Darwin&#8217; blog carnival. </em></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to write this post. I am very much of the opinion that holding up one man as a figurehead for an entire science is a mistake, and sets up too many straw-man arguments for detractors to propound (of the nature of: x was mistaken, so his theory y must also be wrong). Darwin lived in the 19th century, limited by the 19th century&#8217;s knowledge of science. A period where &#8216;Biology&#8217; as a science didn&#8217;t really exist. Of course he was wrong about some stuff, and by equating Evolution with Darwinism, we give the denialists a stick with which to beat us (and this also leads to misleading and pernicious headlines like <a title="'Darwin was wrong'" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.600-why-darwin-was-wrong-about-the-tree-of-life.html" target="_blank">that in the New Scientist</a> a couple of weeks ago). I &#8216;believe&#8217; in the theory of gravity (as supported by the weight (ho ho) of evidence), that doesn&#8217;t make me a Newtonist.</p>
<p>There is no doubting that evolution is more than just Darwin, and that the Darwinian view of evolution probably doesn&#8217;t totally hold water any more, but that is hardly a surprise. It is 150 years old (in its published form). So, much as I admire his achievements, I wasn&#8217;t totally behind the idea of &#8216;Darwin Day&#8217;. Grist to the mill of creationists who see Darwin as the sole pedestal for the Theory of Evolution.</p>
<p>But then you see the <a title="Coffee hallucinations" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/sciencenews/4227673/Three-cups-of-brewed-coffee-a-day-triples-risk-of-hallucinations.html" target="_blank">amount</a> of <a title="Most depressing day of the year" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/article2145314.ece" target="_blank">pseudoscience</a> that <a title="Bloody MMR anecdotes" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1126035/Six-months-MMR-jab--bubbly-little-girl-struggles-speak-walk-feed-herself.html" target="_blank">persists </a>in the mainstream media, and results of surveys like <a title="Guardian report - evolution survey" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/feb/01/evolution-darwin-survey-creationism" target="_blank">this one</a>, which suggests that around 10% of Britons believe the earth was created by a supernatural being sometime in the last 10,000 years, and you think: &#8216;Why should I be churlish about something which is basically pro-science, and is getting a shed-load of <a title="BBC Darwin site" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/darwin/" target="_blank">high quality</a>, high profile coverage?&#8217;. So, yes, if I can increase the positive noise surrounding February 12th 2009, I will. I will shout about Darwin from the rooftops if it gets something close to actual science in the news pages for a change.</p>
<p>For the rest of this year, this is where the battle will be fought. The hearts and minds of the anti-science luddites must be won over by the elegance and wonder of a beautiful theory, arrived at by a brilliant man who spent many years of his life in painstaking examination of the many glorious wonders of the natural world, and slowly formulating a way in which they were all connected. He truly changed our understanding of the world. Let us celebrate that fact.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t call me a Darwinist.</p>
<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->
</div> <!-- kcite-section 136 -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/136/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://citizenship.typepad.com/blogfordarwin/DarwinBadge.gif" />
		<media:content url="http://citizenship.typepad.com/blogfordarwin/DarwinBadge.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Blog For Darwin</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

