w<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fuzzier Logic &#187; badscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/tag/badscience/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com</link>
	<description>Logic. Just a bit woolier.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Telomerase &#8211; make your skin immortal!</title>
		<link>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/342</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/342#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that the beauty industry has made a habit of twisting science somewhat for it&#8217;s own ends (see <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/410/">this</a> and <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2003/11/because-youre-worth-it/">this</a> for instance), but this one takes the biscuit.<br /> The wife spotted a piece in Harper&#8217;s Bazaar while she was in the hairdressers yesterday, about an amazing new beauty treatment (the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="kcite-section" kcite-section-id="342">
<div class="posterous_autopost">I know that the beauty industry has made a habit of twisting science somewhat for it&#8217;s own ends (see <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2007/05/410/">this</a> and <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2003/11/because-youre-worth-it/">this</a> for instance), but this one takes the biscuit.<br />
The wife spotted a piece in Harper&#8217;s Bazaar while she was in the hairdressers yesterday, about an amazing new beauty treatment (the article itself is hard to link to, but it&#8217;s number 3 in the list of &#8220;<a href="http://www.harpersbazaar.com/beauty/beauty-articles/skin-care-0310">9 Skin Secrets for Spring</a>&#8220;). Injections of telomerase for $1,500 a pop. Apparently it &#8216;stimulates resting stem cells&#8217;. Obviously the Harper&#8217;s piece has guff about it being Nobel-prize winning technology.</div>
<div class="posterous_autopost"></div>
<div class="posterous_autopost">Telomerase is an enzyme that amplifies DNA repeats at the ends of chromosomes, without this activity, the telomeres would get progressively shorter until the &#8220;Hayflick limit&#8221; is reached and the cell will stop dividing, or undergo programmed cell death (there&#8217;s a reasonable review of the role of telomerase here: <a href="http://www.jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/full/18/13/2626">http://www.jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/full/18/13/2626</a>).</div>
<div class="posterous_autopost"></div>
<div class="posterous_autopost">Now I&#8217;m no expert, but as far as I know, telomerase is turned off in normal somatic cells, and telomerase activity has been associated with up to 90% of cancers (even its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomerase">Wikipedia entry</a> will tell me this much, a rather old paper with some concrete figures can be found here: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1016/S0959-8049%2897%2900062-2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00062-2</a>). I&#8217;m not suggesting for a second that injecting telomerase will give you cancer (the overwhelming probability is it will do nothing at all), but this seems to be an amazing example of abusing science in the name of &#8216;beauty&#8217;.</div>
<div class="posterous_autopost">
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a> from <a href="http://sjcockell.posterous.com/telomerase-make-your-skin-immortal">Simon&#8217;s posterous</a></p>
</div>
<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->
</div> <!-- kcite-section 342 -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/342/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>MMR scaremongerer sicks the legal dogs on Ben Goldacre</title>
		<link>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/130</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/130#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[badscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weirdos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let the blogosphere and twittersphere spring to his defence!</p> <p><a title="Bad Science plea for help" href="http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/legal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering/" target="_blank">See here for full details</a>, but a <a title="Jeni Barnett - MMR loon" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeni_Barnett" target="_blank">London broadcaster</a> had a half hour long rant on her show about the &#8216;dangers&#8217; of the MMR jab on 7th January. <a title="Twitter - Ben [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="kcite-section" kcite-section-id="130">
<p>Let the blogosphere and twittersphere spring to his defence!</p>
<p><a title="Bad Science plea for help" href="http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/legal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering/" target="_blank">See here for full details</a>, but a <a title="Jeni Barnett - MMR loon" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeni_Barnett" target="_blank">London broadcaster</a> had a half hour long rant on her show about the &#8216;dangers&#8217; of the MMR jab on 7th January. <a title="Twitter - Ben Goldacre" href="http://twitter.com/bengoldacre" target="_blank">Ben Goldacre</a> subsequently posted the entire, repulsive, segment on his blog, to show this woman up for the scaremongerer she is. The <a title="LBC" href="http://www.lbc.co.uk/" target="_blank">radio station</a> she works for has now set the lawyers on him, insisting he cease and disist.</p>
<p>So I am reposting his plea for help, and posting links to the relevant content (<a title="Original Post" href="http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/bad-science-bingo/" target="_blank">original post here</a>, <a title="OFCOM" href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/complain/" target="_blank">complain about the broadcast here</a>). If you have the know-how to help him out, please do so.</p>
<p>EDIT &#8211; You can get the audio of the original broacast from <a title="YouTube Audio" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/rachiesyd" target="_blank">YouTube</a> or <a title="WikiLeaks audio" href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Bad_Science:_Jeni_Barnett_MMR_and_vaccination_slot_on_LBC_radio,_2009" target="_blank">WikiLeaks</a>&#8230; if you want your head to explode with frustration&#8230; Also note <a title="Measles incidence" href="http://www.thatsfuckingstupid.com/index.php/2009/02/just-a-quickie-update/" target="_blank">this graph</a>, which illustrates the very real effect of irresponsible woo like this.</p>
<!-- kcite active, but no citations found -->
</div> <!-- kcite-section 130 -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/130/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

