Impact factors, Colossus and the Wakefield retraction.

Today was one of those days where lots of interesting stuff turns up. On the BBC, there was 2 very good pieces about the flaws in the scientific process, specifically closed peer review and impact factors.
I also notice that the BBC are running a daily piece about the history of computing in the UK this week, parts one and two have already been published. Today’s article about Colossus is especially good.
Also, after last week’s excellent, and damning, judgement from the GMC -
- regarding Andrew Wakefield’s reprehensible behaviour in his research into the ‘link’ between MMR and autism, today The Lancet finally pulled the paper in which his findings were published 12 years ago. Wakefield et al (1998) (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0) has now been retracted from the public record after the Lancet concluded that the claims made by the researchers were ‘false’ (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2810%2960175-7/fulltext – apologies for paywall).
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Additional comments powered by BackType
Search
Twitter Updates
- So apparently the 'BBC has learned' about a planned shutdown that was announced in Jan: http://is.gd/a6TkU Woeful journalism 17 hrs ago
- great set of articles from Nature Methods on visualizing biological data: http://is.gd/9WMCm 2 days ago
- $60?? For a single article?? You've got to be freaking kidding me?? 5 days ago
- Extremely frustrating day. Meetings, teaching and PowerPoint hell. 1 week ago
- today: writing talk for #IB2010 1 week ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Powered by Twitter Tools
Blogroll
On Fuzzier Logic
ResearchBlogging.org
Blog Stats
Visits today: 4Total Visits: 5788










